The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.
Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.
If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.
In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.
Do you have questions how to use the Greyhound-Data website? Or do you have ideas how to improve the site?
Well Done IGB
Tony Gallagher Australia (Team Member) Posts 5905 Dogs 12928 / Races 40210 01 May 2020 10:35
(23)
(0)
Greyhound-Data offered to work with you to track all dogs in Ireland from birth to death for free. You obviously thought it better to spend 245,000. It is a shame you did not use us and spend this money on welfare or helping the grass roots greyhound man through the current crisis.
"A company in Cheltenham has won the contract to develop a new software system to trace the lives of all greyhounds in Ireland - ten months after it emerged that thousands of these dogs are culled every year. The tender was awarded to Event Log Ltd by the Irish Greyhound Board and will cost 245,000 to build and involves 92,200 in licensing fees each year. When developed the new system will closely track each tattooed dog after it is 12-weeks old."
Francis Walsh Ireland (Verified User) Posts 390 Dogs 0 / Races 0 01 May 2020 17:49
(6)
(0)
They are top heavy in the brains dept our crowd, the problem is they have to answer to nobody,
Tony Gallagher Australia (Team Member) Posts 5905 Dogs 12928 / Races 40210 01 May 2020 20:02
(15)
(0)
Francis, it really is frustrating and I am not racing, breeding or training in Ireland so I can only imagine how you guys feel.
Spending money and committing future funds while tracks are closing, participates are struggling to survive and the future of greyhound racing in Ireland is not clear is simply crazy.
Yes they need to account for all dogs but even not using us there are cheaper ways. The IGB has an I.T. department which has a massive budget. They have the records of the pups born, they have the records of the dogs racing, they have the records of how many dogs are exported. The only thing lacking is how many dogs are homed by official groups, how many dogs that trainers, owners and breeders have at home or have homed privately. The GD team has been collecting this information for a while now and we could help fill in some of the gaps. Without these facts the IGB will end up with a lot of missing dogs which the antis will jump on.
So again I will ask the IGB to contact us [email protected] if we can help fill in some of the gaps and of course this help will be given for free.
David Dunne Ireland (Verified User) Posts 1374 Dogs 108 / Races 26 02 May 2020 05:40
(10)
(0)
Tony Gallagher wrote:
Greyhound-Data offered to work with you to track all dogs in Ireland from birth to death for free. You obviously thought it better to spend 245,000. It is a shame you did not use us and spend this money on welfare or helping the grass roots greyhound man through the current crisis.
"A company in Cheltenham has won the contract to develop a new software system to trace the lives of all greyhounds in Ireland - ten months after it emerged that thousands of these dogs are culled every year. The tender was awarded to Event Log Ltd by the Irish Greyhound Board and will cost 245,000 to build and involves 92,200 in licensing fees each year. When developed the new system will closely track each tattooed dog after it is 12-weeks old."
Does this mean that IGB have taken over the Stud Book from the ICC?
Ian Lindsay United Kingdom (Verified User) Posts 85 Dogs 3321 / Races 5032 02 May 2020 13:45
(4)
(0)
Unbelievable! They leave half the country with one track (Dundalk) then there is any amount of money for admin.
Martin James Ireland (Verified User) Posts 1127 Dogs 5 / Races 0 02 May 2020 18:19
(5)
(0)
Ian Lindsay wrote:
Unbelievable! They leave half the country with one track (Dundalk) then there is any amount of money for admin.
From the Power report.
Owners represent the foundation upon which the rest of the industry is built. The owners are the ones who rear or purchase the greyhounds; who arrange the training of the greyhounds; and who ultimately facilitate everything that occurs in the industry.
Jack Ogilvie Australia (Verified User) Posts 15466 Dogs 0 / Races 1 03 May 2020 05:10
(2)
(0)
From afar .what a disgrace . The main purpose of any controlling body is racing ,the rest is secondary.
Kevin Wright Australia (Verified User) Posts 5708 Dogs 1 / Races 1 03 May 2020 06:12
(1)
(0)
Jack Ogilvie wrote:
From afar .what a disgrace . The main purpose of any controlling body is racing ,the rest is secondary.
I have no idea why they would pay all of that money for something they already have got for FREE...
I hope this Company will not STEAL GD ... Data that GD has stored and collected by us the Members over many years ..FOR FREE
How will any Company get retirement information without the help of our Members World wide on GD and our adoption Groups
Greyhound Data and its Members have added thousands of unrecorded Greyhounds over many years and the amount of pictures now being added by our Adoption groups is incredible one facebook page alone
called YOUR GREYHOUNDS HISTORY have downloaded thousands of pictures to the retirement pages over the past 6 months alone ...
Stephen Potter Ireland (Verified User) Posts 424 Dogs 127 / Races 0 03 May 2020 07:18
(0)
(0)
the system the igb are putting in place will track a pup from earmarking stage something data is not doing at the moment,only dogs which have had a race appear on this site unless put up by a paid up member,i did put up any pups i whelped down and reared on this site as early as possible and any that came in for schooling but admin saw fit to stop anyone adding pups or dogs that had not raced unless you are a paid up member.so any pup that does not make the track for whatever reason is not on record as even being whelped down,so i think this new system will show true records of dogs being whelped down through to retirement.
Tony Gallagher Australia (Team Member) Posts 5905 Dogs 12928 / Races 40210 03 May 2020 08:02
(2)
(0)
Hi Stephen, that is why we wanted the IGB and the ICC to work with us to share some information. The IGB will be able to track them until they stop racing but at this point they will find a lot go missing. These are the dogs owners, trainers or breeders have kept or homed privately.
The other alternative the IGB had was to let their I.T. section do the job for them but this also was not done.
The reason Greyhound-Data stopped people that were not paid members entering and editing dogs is due to an attack on the website from anti groups making statement like: This trainer kills dogs etc. Over 300 comments were made which had to be identified and removed, by the time we removed them more were added. I am sure if you advertised a dog for sale and had this placed on your dog's pedigree you would agree with the action we took. Since restricting adding dogs to paid members this has not occurred.
Stephen Potter Ireland (Verified User) Posts 424 Dogs 127 / Races 0 03 May 2020 08:40
(0)
(0)
Tony Gallagher wrote:
Hi Stephen, that is why we wanted the IGB and the ICC to work with us to share some information. The IGB will be able to track them until they stop racing but at this point they will find a lot go missing. These are the dogs owners, trainers or breeders have kept or homed privately.
The other alternative the IGB had was to let their I.T. section do the job for them but this also was not done.
The reason Greyhound-Data stopped people that were not paid members entering and editing dogs is due to an attack on the website from anti groups making statement like: This trainer kills dogs etc. Over 300 comments were made which had to be identified and removed, by the time we removed them more were added. I am sure if you advertised a dog for sale and had this placed on your dog's pedigree you would agree with the action we took. Since restricting adding dogs to paid members this has not occurred.
i can understand your reasoning behind thattony but you still have the problem of pups not being put on the site until having a race.
David Park United Kingdom (Verified User) Posts 71 Dogs 0 / Races 0 03 May 2020 16:33
(4)
(0)
They have found another way to scam money out of the greyhound funds
Barrie Backhurst United Kingdom (Verified User) Posts 323 Dogs 0 / Races 0 03 May 2020 19:11
(7)
(0)
stephen potter wrote:
Tony Gallagher wrote:
Hi Stephen, that is why we wanted the IGB and the ICC to work with us to share some information. The IGB will be able to track them until they stop racing but at this point they will find a lot go missing. These are the dogs owners, trainers or breeders have kept or homed privately.
The other alternative the IGB had was to let their I.T. section do the job for them but this also was not done.
The reason Greyhound-Data stopped people that were not paid members entering and editing dogs is due to an attack on the website from anti groups making statement like: This trainer kills dogs etc. Over 300 comments were made which had to be identified and removed, by the time we removed them more were added. I am sure if you advertised a dog for sale and had this placed on your dog's pedigree you would agree with the action we took. Since restricting adding dogs to paid members this has not occurred.
i can understand your reasoning behind thattony but you still have the problem of pups not being put on the site until having a race.
Stephen, I think that Tony's opening post
"Well Done IGB Greyhound-Data offered to work with you to track all dogs in Ireland from birth to death for free. You obviously thought it better to spend 245,000. It is a shame you did not use us and spend this money on welfare or helping the grass roots greyhound man through the current crisis."
clearly indicates that GD was intending to work with the IGB on records from birth, rather than the current system where a dog has to race to be recorded here.
I for one think that it was a great gesture from Tony that we could all benefit from, including GD itself. The fact that the framework already exists and was being offered for free should have meant that it was a no brainer for the IGB to accept