home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions about breeding theories?
Or do you need tips on how to rear your pups?

Sire for Silent Enemy.page  1 2 3 

Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

21 Feb 2023 05:44


 (0)
 (0)


Donna Sadler wrote:

Paul Dicks wrote:

Hard to go past the GOAT.

I do agree, its hard to go past Fernando for this litter. The previous litter are with some very successful owners and rearers so they will have every chance to succeed. They are only seven months old but already standout ripper pups.

A couple of people have been against Fernando simply because it is a repeat mating . Her first litter are only seven months old and the bitch is not even four so its not like she is having her fourth litter and shes eight years old.....
I have no problem at all with putting her back to Fernando myself but just wondering others thoughts.
As far as I can see - genetics are genetics and provided the second litter have at LEAST the same quality rearing, handling, breaking, training and good luck etc, why would they have to be inferior?
I know with performance horses and working dogs when we get a good cross we stick to it and often do the same breedings repeatedly and its not uncommon for the younger siblings to outshine the earlier ones at the same age.
So I am very interested to hear peoples' thoughts on why greyhounds might be any different? There may be very sound reasons for it that I am not aware of.
Thankyou.

I'm certainly no expert. I'd be investing another $120 with Braschy. Using him might be putting all your eggs in one Fernando Bale basket as Sandro indicated. When FBs are good they are very good, when they are bad they are horrible. Bernado would be high on the list I'd imagine, but then you have 2 litters with KC and All line sires coming through. Aussie Infrared could be plan B. Like I said money spent on Braschy's opinion is money well spent.




Michael Worth
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 875
Dogs 2 / Races 0

21 Feb 2023 06:37


 (0)
 (0)


Hey Donna, theres one I Ike that I think most breeders would not consider, and that is Orson Allen. I think the line breeding of well performed brother and sister who are positioned to impact ,with an outcross on top could produce something special. Token Melody obviously produced some handy pups and she was mated similar to her sister bazwill , whose best litter was to Elite State or the credibility line same as BDC. Their daughters were also mated the same to bit chilli who also went on to produce dogs like Bye Bye Bucks. For this reason I also like sires such as Wow as his bottom line goes back to History Lesson. Others are dogs like Out of Range although not in X, Aston Rupee, Aston Duke and there are others with similar dam lines. One that stands out but is not very commercial with only ninety odd pups on the ground but with at least three group performers is Aston Galilee. And obviously the GOAT is a good option but dont overlook his dam as nothing clicks with everything. These are just my opinions and observations. Good luck with which ever sire you choose. Cheers



Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

21 Feb 2023 06:57


 (0)
 (0)


Donna Sadler wrote:

....As far as I can see - genetics are genetics and provided the second litter have at LEAST the same quality rearing, handling, breaking, training and good luck etc, why would they have to be inferior?
................So I am very interested to hear peoples' thoughts on why greyhounds might be any different? There may be very sound reasons for it that I am not aware of.
Thankyou.

When niches click, my estimation is they work somewhere between 35%-45% of the time. So if your first litter is successful it's likely the next two litters may not click. jmo.


Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

21 Feb 2023 06:57


 (0)
 (0)


Orson has underperformed as a sire thus far. Besides that is another KC and All line sire. Donna has already used Aston Rupee.

I'm surprised no one has suggested Royal Assassin. This bitch is way too well performed for some to be considered a potential brood ;-)


Donna Sadler
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1731
Dogs 59 / Races 6

21 Feb 2023 09:47


 (0)
 (0)


Thanks Paul for bumping up that interesting thread about repeat meetings
-
Very interesting thread and wonderful to see the big breeders opinions. Many cases FOR repeat matings and not so many against.

Peter Giles Comment: "The best litter Ihave ever bred was from a repeat mating of Gun Law Osti and Floodgate. Ihave bred repeat matings a lot of times and the second litter is always as good as the first,if not better."

Helen Ivers Comment: "I've always found them to work really well for me. Genetics is genetics and I don't understand why any breeder would shy away from repeat matings."

Des Dooley Comment: "I bred one repeat mating many years ago. I'd be a lot more confident about breeding a repeat mating again if the dam was six years old or younger and if she hadn't had more than three or four litters."

Paul Wheeler and Paul Bartolo- esteemed breeders and not so keen BUT they both have done them with success.

Makes me that much more comfortable re breeding to Fernando. It seems they CAN most certainly work but, as ANYTHING to do with breeding ANY animals - genetics is not an exact science and all you can do is try to narrow the odds by studying nicks and crosses, studying and knowing your female and try to find a male whos breeding has nicked and who compliments your female's good points, hopefully won't intensify her weaker points and then............keep your fingers crossed!


Matt Griffiths
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1955
Dogs 56 / Races 2

21 Feb 2023 10:32


 (0)
 (0)


Paul Dicks wrote:

This bitch is way too well performed for some to be considered a potential brood ;-)

She's obviously very worthy of litters. I'd just personally be going to something with super hard chase for peace of mind


Roger Spry
United Kingdom
(Verified User)
Posts 69
Dogs 0 / Races 0

21 Feb 2023 12:39


 (0)
 (0)


Hi Donna,
In order to get away from ending up with 300-400 mt hounds that breeders in Australia have been churning out for many years now in very high numbers at least you are starting off with a good bitch that has a great chance of producing 500-730 mt race dogs of quality.
I would put your bitch to one of these three dogs , the reasons are very obvious when you look at the print out of back generations .

1 Aussie Infrared
2 Hard Style Rico
3 Feral Franky

Bella Infrared was one of the hardest and toughest dogs to grace a greyhound track in many a year , he also would have won over the 700 mt had he gone over that trip , this is a huge plus when using one of his sons.
you know all there is to know about Feral Franky.

Best of luck Donna ,


Donna Sadler
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1731
Dogs 59 / Races 6

21 Feb 2023 21:28


 (0)
 (0)


Paul Dicks wrote:

Ryan Vanderwert wrote:

Donna Sadler wrote:

....As far as I can see - genetics are genetics and provided the second litter have at LEAST the same quality rearing, handling, breaking, training and good luck etc, why would they have to be inferior?
................So I am very interested to hear peoples' thoughts on why greyhounds might be any different? There may be very sound reasons for it that I am not aware of.
Thankyou.

When niches click, my estimation is they work somewhere between 35%-45% of the time. So if your first litter is successful it's likely the next two litters may not click. jmo.

I read some rubbish on this site over the years, but this is up there with the biggest load of BS yet. Someone claiming they can quantify the success rate of a repeat mating is completely ridiculous.

Say how you feel Paul! LOL! I have to agree with you -
Im sure Ryan has his reasons but I did think it was a pretty big call to be able to work out percentages and the LIKELIHOOD of the next litter NOT working? I did a bit if research myself last night - there are a LOT of nicks and repeat meetings that do consistently throw very good pups. At the end of the day, though, unless you know the circumstances of every pup in every litter its a hard call anyway -- which ones were reared well, which ones werent broken in properly, which ones went to bad trainers, which ones went to elite trainers, which ones were injured, which ones were "helped"........




Jack Ogilvie
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 15483
Dogs 0 / Races 1

21 Feb 2023 22:52


 (0)
 (0)


Donna, Donna,Donna Helped.



Jack Ogilvie
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 15483
Dogs 0 / Races 1

21 Feb 2023 23:04


 (0)
 (0)


Hi Donna, if you can find a my bro fabio straw would be a good choice, good nicks, and what your bitch needs is strength..cheers jack.



Michael Bowerman
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4615
Dogs 11 / Races 0

21 Feb 2023 23:41


 (0)
 (0)


Sandro Bechini wrote:

There are no sound reasons, except for the fact that you don't know whether Fernando Bale will click with this bitch, as the first litter is too young

That's why breeders usually repeat at the 1st and 3rd and not straight after, but like I mentioned before, it depends on what you are aiming to do - pup sales or finding out what really might click with this bitch

a lot of money gone if it dont work sandro. with cost of feed very high now.



Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

22 Feb 2023 02:20


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Bowerman wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

There are no sound reasons, except for the fact that you don't know whether Fernando Bale will click with this bitch, as the first litter is too young

That's why breeders usually repeat at the 1st and 3rd and not straight after, but like I mentioned before, it depends on what you are aiming to do - pup sales or finding out what really might click with this bitch

a lot of money gone if it dont work sandro. with cost of feed very high now.

Whats your point?

I think we already know its expensive to keep greyhounds these days

Generally each pup will cost $8 -$15k to get to it past the pre-training stage and to the track depending on the cost of the pup to the purchaser

So what are you saying? For the 2nd mating does Donna go for the back to back repeat and the big puppy bucks and go to Fernando or go to a more modest sire but one who may suit her pedigree.


Donna Sadler
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1731
Dogs 59 / Races 6

22 Feb 2023 07:23


 (0)
 (0)


Sandro Bechini wrote:

Michael Bowerman wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

There are no sound reasons, except for the fact that you don't know whether Fernando Bale will click with this bitch, as the first litter is too young

That's why breeders usually repeat at the 1st and 3rd and not straight after, but like I mentioned before, it depends on what you are aiming to do - pup sales or finding out what really might click with this bitch

a lot of money gone if it dont work sandro. with cost of feed very high now.

Whats your point?

I think we already know its expensive to keep greyhounds these days

Generally each pup will cost $8 -$15k to get to it past the pre-training stage and to the track depending on the cost of the pup to the purchaser

So what are you saying? For the 2nd mating does Donna go for the back to back repeat and the big puppy bucks and go to Fernando or go to a more modest sire but one who may suit her pedigree.

With all due respect ( and you I know I respect your opinion greatly Sandro) ) Does it have to be big bucks OR one that might suit her pedigree?
Is there a reason it cant be both?
I would have thought with how well Fernando crossed with her dam( not just Tommy, the whole litter won and there were a number of above average race dogs in that litter) Would you not say that it was a proven cross so clearly that sire suits that damline and we know he is good over Barcia bitches. I am not ONLY interested in big money pups. I am striving to breed elite race dogs, so I am not sure why that dog does not suit her pedigree.
I did get David to do a breeding analysis and his words were the obvious choice is Fernando AND He has also given me some other very interesting sires - David is BRILLIANT at what he does and I take his suggestions very seriously!I have a Fernando straw for her but I just need some time to look thru the other suggestions more thoroughly :-)



Graham Moscow
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1186
Dogs 0 / Races 0

22 Feb 2023 07:48


 (1)
 (0)


Donna Sadler wrote:

Thanks Paul for bumping up that interesting thread about repeat meetings
-
Very interesting thread and wonderful to see the big breeders opinions. Many cases FOR repeat matings and not so many against.

Peter Giles Comment: "The best litter Ihave ever bred was from a repeat mating of Gun Law Osti and Floodgate. Ihave bred repeat matings a lot of times and the second litter is always as good as the first,if not better."

Helen Ivers Comment: "I've always found them to work really well for me. Genetics is genetics and I don't understand why any breeder would shy away from repeat matings."

Des Dooley Comment: "I bred one repeat mating many years ago. I'd be a lot more confident about breeding a repeat mating again if the dam was six years old or younger and if she hadn't had more than three or four litters."

Paul Wheeler and Paul Bartolo- esteemed breeders and not so keen BUT they both have done them with success.

Makes me that much more comfortable re breeding to Fernando. It seems they CAN most certainly work but, as ANYTHING to do with breeding ANY animals - genetics is not an exact science and all you can do is try to narrow the odds by studying nicks and crosses, studying and knowing your female and try to find a male whos breeding has nicked and who compliments your female's good points, hopefully won't intensify her weaker points and then............keep your fingers crossed!

There is a Pizer video from the 90s where Mark Ducos interviewed PAW. Ducos asked if PAW if repeat matings work. PAW reply was yes but he preferred to go to a different sire in between the repeat mating


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

22 Feb 2023 09:16


 (0)
 (0)


Donna Sadler wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

Michael Bowerman wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

There are no sound reasons, except for the fact that you don't know whether Fernando Bale will click with this bitch, as the first litter is too young

That's why breeders usually repeat at the 1st and 3rd and not straight after, but like I mentioned before, it depends on what you are aiming to do - pup sales or finding out what really might click with this bitch

a lot of money gone if it dont work sandro. with cost of feed very high now.

Whats your point?

I think we already know its expensive to keep greyhounds these days

Generally each pup will cost $8 -$15k to get to it past the pre-training stage and to the track depending on the cost of the pup to the purchaser

So what are you saying? For the 2nd mating does Donna go for the back to back repeat and the big puppy bucks and go to Fernando or go to a more modest sire but one who may suit her pedigree.

With all due respect ( and you I know I respect your opinion greatly Sandro) ) Does it have to be big bucks OR one that might suit her pedigree?
Is there a reason it cant be both?
I would have thought with how well Fernando crossed with her dam( not just Tommy, the whole litter won and there were a number of above average race dogs in that litter) Would you not say that it was a proven cross so clearly that sire suits that damline and we know he is good over Barcia bitches. I am not ONLY interested in big money pups. I am striving to breed elite race dogs, so I am not sure why that dog does not suit her pedigree.
I did get David to do a breeding analysis and his words were the obvious choice is Fernando AND He has also given me some other very interesting sires - David is BRILLIANT at what he does and I take his suggestions very seriously!I have a Fernando straw for her but I just need some time to look thru the other suggestions more thoroughly :-)

I agree in the main with David.

Fernando all the way is the obvious choice and should throw some nice pups ,but I think there are better options, but seeing you have PAID for Davids advice and he has given you those other options, my only advice is that you SHOULD use it wisely.





Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

23 Feb 2023 04:07


 (0)
 (0)


https:/ CLICK HERE Is the 20% difference in the pedigree going to make the offspring better or worse than Tommy Shelby ?

Knowing how fast Tommy Shelby was, logic states the window of opportunity is far less to produce a better one than Tommy Shelby by altering Tommy's pedigree by 20%. If Tommy Shelby was a country dog or bordering on city Grade 5 then your percentages may be a lot better with the 20% pedigree alteration.

I believe this point is where breeders may let themselves down more often than not.

It's not impossible to produce better than Tommy Shelby, but even by adding Barcia to the ped, the odds are very much against your bitch producing beta than Tommy putting Fernando over her, because of how good Tommy was.



Darren Leeson
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1343
Dogs 154 / Races 139

23 Feb 2023 04:43


 (0)
 (0)


Ryan Vanderwert wrote:

https:/ CLICK HERE Is the 20% difference in the pedigree going to make the offspring better or worse than Tommy Shelby ?

Knowing how fast Tommy Shelby was, logic states the window of opportunity is far less to produce a better one than Tommy Shelby by altering Tommy's pedigree by 20%. If Tommy Shelby was a country dog or bordering on city Grade 5 then your percentages may be a lot better with the 20% pedigree alteration.

I believe this point is where breeders may let themselves down more often than not.

It's not impossible to produce better than Tommy Shelby, but even by adding Barcia to the ped, the odds are very much against your bitch producing beta than Tommy putting Fernando over her, because of how good Tommy was.

Its not about trying to reproduce Tommy Shelby Ryan, but elite class - https:/ CLICK HERE

Its about trying to get the mix of bloodlines correct - https:/ CLICK HERE





Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

23 Feb 2023 04:54


 (0)
 (0)


Hi Darren,

Wyndra All Class is a little different as it's closer to 10% different not 20% different, as is with the Fernando cross.

I wld think everyone breeding wld want to try to produce a Tommy Shelby or better ?

As I said not impossible but.......

P.S. I've never been a fan of copying a top dogs ped as you put yourself behind the 8 ball trying to create better than himself. It makes more sense to copy a decent grade 5 performer and say add a Barcia or Fernando or a full brother/ sister to them into a ped to produce a group performer. Fedex for example was bred that way.



Darren Leeson
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1343
Dogs 154 / Races 139

23 Feb 2023 05:13


 (0)
 (0)


Its not about copying a dogs pedigree, but putting together lines that work with each other.

Even in my own Wow x Instafamous mating. I didnt try to copy Wyndra All Class. As I do with all my matings - I put the pedigree together and then go try find it working in other elite dogs. To suggest to me Im on the right track.

One thing about breeding, the more things change, the more they stay the same!



Ryan Vanderwert
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5958
Dogs 8 / Races 0

23 Feb 2023 05:30


 (0)
 (0)


Copying is exactly what it is tho, unless you've got another way to explain it. Your Instafamous ped is 25% different to WAC in the 5th gen. I don't like the logic of copying, unless you copy a lower grade dog and add something superior to that ped to improve it, but wish you luck with yours. Cheers.

posts 55page  1 2 3