home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions regarding the health of your greyhound? Do you need tips what you should feed your dog?
Or do you need advice in curing an injury?

Kibblepage  1 2 3 4 5 

Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

26 Jan 2015 09:35


 (0)
 (0)


Mark Schlegel wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

You are better off getting a Nutribullet and pulverising vegies with water


Still wasting your time and money IMO.

This is a very good article on why dogs can "survive" with grains, veges, starch and carbs in their diets.....but it isn't their ideal diet, and it certainly doesn't mean they will thrive.

EXTERNAL LINK

From your article Mark:

"In contrast, the intestines of an omnivore or herbivore are longer to accommodate the fermentation times required when digesting carbohydrates.

In a carnivore, plant matter is expelled quickly, before it can be fully digested and the vitamins and minerals can be absorbed because of their short digestive tract.

This is EXACTLY why many BARF feeders puree their fruits and veggies before serving them to their dogs."

It doesn't say that they won't benefit from the nutrients in plant matter once broken down.

It only says that it is not ideal to make it the major part of a diet and common sense dictates you wouldn't



Tom Flanagan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7250
Dogs 974 / Races 1022

26 Jan 2015 09:40


 (0)
 (0)


Mark Schlegel wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

You are better off getting a Nutribullet and pulverising vegies with water


Still wasting your time and money IMO.

This is a very good article on why dogs can "survive" with grains, veges, starch and carbs in their diets.....but it isn't their ideal diet, and it certainly doesn't mean they will thrive.

EXTERNAL LINK

So what do you feed then Mark?



Tom Flanagan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7250
Dogs 974 / Races 1022

26 Jan 2015 09:51


 (0)
 (0)


Does anyone know of any trainer that feeds their racing greyhounds only meat, that is, no kibble or other grain based food, and no vegetables?

Given the way this discussion is going it is an important question.




Mark Schlegel
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3168
Dogs 9 / Races 5

26 Jan 2015 10:02


 (0)
 (0)


Sandro Bechini wrote:

Mark Schlegel wrote:

Sandro Bechini wrote:

You are better off getting a Nutribullet and pulverising vegies with water


Still wasting your time and money IMO.

This is a very good article on why dogs can "survive" with grains, veges, starch and carbs in their diets.....but it isn't their ideal diet, and it certainly doesn't mean they will thrive.

EXTERNAL LINK

From your article Mark:

"In contrast, the intestines of an omnivore or herbivore are longer to accommodate the fermentation times required when digesting carbohydrates.

In a carnivore, plant matter is expelled quickly, before it can be fully digested and the vitamins and minerals can be absorbed because of their short digestive tract.

This is EXACTLY why many BARF feeders puree their fruits and veggies before serving them to their dogs."

It doesn't say that they won't benefit from the nutrients in plant matter once broken down.

It only says that it is not ideal to make it the major part of a diet and common sense dictates you wouldn't


True...but that is merely pointing out the methods BARF feeders for example try to justify adding vegetables.

It does mention later that "dogs lack the salivary enzymes to digest plant matter, consuming fruits and veggies places an additional burden on the pancreas tasking it with producing extra enzymes to deal with the starch, cellulose and carbohydrates. Feeding these foods strain the pancreas, making it work harder to produce more enzymes than normally needed to digest proteins and fats."

It might help the digestive efforts somewhat to blend it, but it doesn't change the fact that fruits and veges are not good for your dog.

Tom Flanagan wrote:

So what do you feed then Mark?

Tom,

When I started, most trainers fed beef and bread (wholemeal, not whole grains which they can't digest). Mornings were usually a couple of 2x4 biscuits.
I used to add Feramo (and tried a few other vitamin supplements), a Slow K tablet and some calcium. Breakfast was either the biscuits or toast with vegemite and White-e sprinkled on top.

After taking a break for about 8 years I came back and fed the beef and bread with some calcium powder still but threw out all the other supplements and gave them Kohnke's Energy Gold and Stockgain on alternate days. Occasionally they get some bones.

Breakfast became a cup of Coprice. I know it's not giving them much......but it puts something in their stomachs in the morning and doesn't cost $100+ a bag.

I feed the bread and kibble in the expectation that it will not do anything other than provide some fibre (roughage) and slow down the digestive process somewhat (firmer stools and greater nutrient uptake from the meat and fats in their food).

I've tried expensive kibbles and they have NEVER improved any of my dogs. Some however have definitely slowed them down.



Mark Schlegel
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 3168
Dogs 9 / Races 5

26 Jan 2015 10:19


 (0)
 (0)


Don't get me wrong.....I'm not saying you shouldn't feed kibble at all.

Just don't pay exorbitant prices for ingredients that are of no benefit to your dog.

I think it was Tom Meulman that wrote an excellent article on why the "wheat allergy" thing is a complete furphy? Regardless, if you do spend big dollars on a grain free alternative, they have just replaced grains with other carbs and starches (sweet potato.....peas....chick peas.....).

Dogs do need some roughage.
Unless you have a steady supply of fresh rabbit skins, small digestible bones and offal, then kibble or bread are the easiest way to give it to them.
Just don't think that they are going to get much more benefit than that out of it!


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

26 Jan 2015 10:44


 (0)
 (0)


Hey Mark

Generally I agree with you on all you have said.

Bones can tie dogs up, so they need something that will pass quickly through the system.

However, plants do have nutrients and for dogs they have to released and the only way to do that is to crush them into a liquid pulp which their system will better absorb via the enzymes in their gut



Grant Thomas
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 11447
Dogs 64 / Races 20

26 Jan 2015 11:03


 (0)
 (0)


The info night we had at Dapto with vet Dr. ???...in the wild dogs get 'carbs' through eating whats in the prey animals gut which is mostly already digested(broken down)...so the Magic Bullet makes some sense...he also said the carbs(kibble) should be fed in the mornings...he prefered rice(white) to other 'grains)...


Tom Flanagan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7250
Dogs 974 / Races 1022

26 Jan 2015 11:47


 (0)
 (0)


Fair enough Mark. Biggest problem is that there is a lot of conflicting information, so I have tried expensive kibbles and cheap kibbles, corn based, wheat based, rice based, and wholemeal bread (which was okay), and ended up sticking with a kibble that my dogs liked and performed well on and looked bright and healthy with a shiny coat. (They turned up their noses at Coprice straight away and went off a few expensive kibbles after a few weeks.) Gave minimal supplements (Salkalite and Calci D), bones once or twice a week.




Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

26 Jan 2015 12:08


 (0)
 (0)


Tom Flanagan wrote:

Does anyone know of any trainer that feeds their racing greyhounds only meat, that is, no kibble or other grain based food, and no vegetables?

Given the way this discussion is going it is an important question.

Tom,

I have fed predominately a raw meat diet for over 2 years.
The carbs are heaped tablespoon of mixed blended vegs (blanched) with a few ground grains...minimal.
The vegs would not amount to anymore than 5% of the diet.

To my thinking, the vitamins and minerals are from natural sources.
Kibble has nothing, its made of waste products cooked in extreme temperatures, so in fact, its nothing plus the added bonus of carcinogenic values and bacteria.
Each to their own and we all have a choice.
My dogs poo is minimal, so for me, I'm seeing what goes in is being utilized.
You put waste in, you get waste out.

There was a Greyhound specific study done a few years ago by a Uni...over 3 years.
Bottom line was...the best result for performance was achieved with 5% carb ratio...NOT MUCH AT ALL!


Tom Flanagan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7250
Dogs 974 / Races 1022

26 Jan 2015 12:23


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Geraghty wrote:

Tom Flanagan wrote:

Does anyone know of any trainer that feeds their racing greyhounds only meat, that is, no kibble or other grain based food, and no vegetables?

Given the way this discussion is going it is an important question.

Tom,

I have fed predominately a raw meat diet for over 2 years.
The carbs are heaped tablespoon of mixed blended vegs (blanched) with a few ground grains...minimal.
The vegs would not amount to anymore than 5% of the diet.

To my thinking, the vitamins and minerals are from natural sources.
Kibble has nothing, its made of waste products cooked in extreme temperatures, so in fact, its nothing plus the added bonus of carcinogenic values and bacteria.
Each to their own and we all have a choice.
My dogs poo is minimal, so for me, I'm seeing what goes in is being utilized.
You put waste in, you get waste out.

There was a Greyhound specific study done a few years ago by a Uni...over 3 years.
Bottom line was...the best result for performance was achieved with 5% carb ratio...NOT MUCH AT ALL!

Thanks Michael - just out of interest, on that diet - how much meat (and what sort) would you give per day to say a 30kg greyhound?



Daryl Barrett
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 1739
Dogs 1 / Races 0

26 Jan 2015 20:06


 (0)
 (0)


Hi Sandro,mate,you hit the nail on the head..again, commonsense,seems there are still a lot of people who don't show enough of it & what i will say is that there should be a balance with,protein,carbs & fat,( again,commonsense),along with beneficial vitamins/minerals.For the record i always used Box One kibble,alternated with pasta/rice,veges(carrot when fed was always grated finely & never cooked)raw egg yolks a couple of times a week,meat alone in my opinion doesn't provide enough of an energy souce & also doe's not provide the fibre that is needed.


Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

26 Jan 2015 23:53


 (0)
 (0)


Tom,
In general terms a 30kg dog I'd feed approx 600grms of roo...meat and fat content will vary depending on dogs metabolism and work load.

Mark's article is an interesting one and its another opinion but there are some excellent points made.
Although the subject is canine its not Greyhound specific.
Who knows, she could be spot on but I can't get my head around not giving the dogs any carbs at all.

I'm no expert and I could be off the mark but what I'm trying to achieve by feeding simple is give the dogs racing life longevity and less complications.
If carbs and starches (vegs) put extra load on the pancreas, I can cop that easier than feeding waste products that cause cancer, kidney, liver, adrenal, and intestinal complications.

What I do believe though is that no diet formula is going to give you 10 lengths.
Hopefully, what a healthier diet will do is give another 10 or 20 starts and less Vet bills!

P.S.
There is a well known trainer who had a champion dog who had a digestive problem.
He used to send blood to a top SCIENTIST for analysis.
She diagnosed the problem and it was treated successfully.
She is a world renown expert in her field who is commissioned from around the world to diagnose and fix problems in elite thoroughbreds.
After she found the problem with his dog, she said to the trainer..."You're not a stupid man so why would you be feeding commercial kibble to this dog? DO YOURSELF AND YOUR DOG A BIG FAVOUR AND MAKE YOUR OWN."
True story.


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

27 Jan 2015 00:06


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Geraghty wrote:

Tom,
In general terms a 30kg dog I'd feed approx 600grms of roo...meat and fat content will vary depending on dogs metabolism and work load.

Mark's article is an interesting one and its another opinion but there are some excellent points made.
Although the subject is canine its not Greyhound specific.
Who knows, she could be spot on but I can't get my head around not giving the dogs any carbs at all.

I'm no expert and I could be off the mark but what I'm trying to achieve by feeding simple is give the dogs racing life longevity and less complications.
If carbs and starches (vegs) put extra load on the pancreas, I can cop that easier than feeding waste products that cause cancer, kidney, liver, adrenal, and intestinal complications.

What I do believe though is that no diet formula is going to give you 10 lengths.
Hopefully, what a healthier diet will do is give another 10 or 20 starts and less Vet bills!

Michael

Why are all dogs at times predisposed to eat grass?

It's a cleanout for their gut. I doubt there is any nuritional value in plain grass.

I agree with you that kibble is of little or no value to the dog and only increases the amount of stools.

If there is any value it may be the extruded plant matter that is included in the 'mix' that helps to clean the dogs gut out

But that can be achieved with a pulped version of rice and vegetables that are friendly to dogs

I believe it is used as 'convenience' food.


Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

27 Jan 2015 00:39


 (0)
 (0)


Sandro,

I've read many theories on eating grass from a biling tool to boredom and everything in between.
I think you are for the most part right...biling, stomach cleanser.

You are also right about a "convenience food" along with a dash of brainwashing and brilliant marketing.

Each to there own and I completely understand the "save time, less hassle factor" of convenience food.
If I had 50 dogs in training I'd have to hire a cook.


Sandro Bechini
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 19488
Dogs 15268 / Races 1856

27 Jan 2015 00:59


 (0)
 (0)


True Michael.

Each to their own.



Michael Bowerman
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4614
Dogs 11 / Races 0

27 Jan 2015 01:06


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Geraghty wrote:

Sandro,

I've read many theories on eating grass from a biling tool to boredom and everything in between.
I think you are for the most part right...biling, stomach cleanser.

You are also right about a "convenience food" along with a dash of brainwashing and brilliant marketing.

Each to there own and I completely understand the "save time, less hassle factor" of convenience food.
If I had 50 dogs in training I'd have to hire a cook.


sandro on grass eating i think u are correct, biling and a stomach cleanser, as for the best kibble is dog pro greyhound .


Tom Flanagan
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7250
Dogs 974 / Races 1022

27 Jan 2015 11:05


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Geraghty wrote:

Tom,
In general terms a 30kg dog I'd feed approx 600grms of roo...meat and fat content will vary depending on dogs metabolism and work load.

Mark's article is an interesting one and its another opinion but there are some excellent points made.
Although the subject is canine its not Greyhound specific.
Who knows, she could be spot on but I can't get my head around not giving the dogs any carbs at all.

I'm no expert and I could be off the mark but what I'm trying to achieve by feeding simple is give the dogs racing life longevity and less complications.
If carbs and starches (vegs) put extra load on the pancreas, I can cop that easier than feeding waste products that cause cancer, kidney, liver, adrenal, and intestinal complications.

What I do believe though is that no diet formula is going to give you 10 lengths.
Hopefully, what a healthier diet will do is give another 10 or 20 starts and less Vet bills!

P.S.
There is a well known trainer who had a champion dog who had a digestive problem.
He used to send blood to a top SCIENTIST for analysis.
She diagnosed the problem and it was treated successfully.
She is a world renown expert in her field who is commissioned from around the world to diagnose and fix problems in elite thoroughbreds.
After she found the problem with his dog, she said to the trainer..."You're not a stupid man so why would you be feeding commercial kibble to this dog? DO YOURSELF AND YOUR DOG A BIG FAVOUR AND MAKE YOUR OWN."
True story.

Thanks Michael, what you say makes a lot of sense - and you are doing as you say - all credit to you. I was sympathetic to the argument that dogs ate stomach contents of their kills until the study of wolves said they didn't.

I'm currently feeding my retired dogs mainly chicken necks and the kibble I mentioned earlier, along with a small amount of crushed steamed vegies - carrots. broccoli and peas, and twice weekly brisket bones - no powdered supplements whatsoever. They are very healthy, happy and full of energy with great teeth and shiny coats, not sure how racers would go on it tho - I would give them more red meat. I worry that straight muscle meat (without any kibble) may not carry the variety of nutrients that you would get from a mix of muscle meat, tendons, bones and nerves that you get by mixing in things like necks and brisket bones.

When I was a kid in the early 70s my dad reared an obscurely bred litter (on a rear them keep half the litter arrangement) on nightly beef and vegie stews (potatoes, carrots, pumpkin, various greens) - we didn't train them ourselves but 3 of the 6 were city class (tho only one of those 3 lived beyond 2 years of age CLICK HERE - most of the others died in a dog trailer accident).

The kibble back then was a lot worse than the stuff available now - nearly every dog racing had runny stools, and you could almost pick the brand of kibble by the colour of the droppings!


Chris Houlding
United Kingdom
(Verified User)
Posts 929
Dogs 10 / Races 3

28 Jan 2015 08:35


 (0)
 (0)


Great post, alot of interesting information for anyone interested in nutrition.


Michael Geraghty
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 4138
Dogs 14 / Races 15

28 Jan 2015 18:53


 (0)
 (0)


Yet another opinion to throw into the mix.

EXTERNAL LINK
Food for thought.



Jamie Quinlivian
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 8727
Dogs 10 / Races 0

28 Jan 2015 19:41


 (0)
 (0)


'non medically trained people (groomers, trainers etc)'

Yeah like medically trained people get everything right.

posts 94page  1 2 3 4 5