| Darren, Any restriction on breeding numbers is a restraint of trade. To be lawful it has to be based on some sort of criteria which themselves are sensible and lawful. No such criteria exist. Euthanasia numbers, even if correct (usually they are not), cannot be such a justification as euthanasia is a legal function in NSW law. Any breaches of euthanasia laws apply to the individual, not to the industry. Since many breeding progeny are destined for interstate, it could also constitute a breach of free interstate trade laws (eg think where all PAW youngsters go). No such restrictions apply to horses, other dogs or cats, which are broadly comparable commercial activities, therefore it is discriminatory to apply them to greyhounds. That is challengeable, too. Such rules cannot be justified on the basis of a shortaqe of cash to support prize money as that is conjectural and is a derived and unrelated effect. It is also illogical in that GRNSW has just finished running surveys to find out how best to stimulate breeding. Was that a different department? If GRNSW wants to close tracks or reduce race numbers that is a different story. It has that power, at least at first glance. It would also have to wear the objections to a forced expulsion of legitimate economic activity to neighbouring states and to reduced tax income. It would also impact on firms providing services to the greyhound industry. No doubt it would also involve a reduction in staff and expenses at GRNSW and GWIC? It seems that GRNSW has exceeded its power as well as good sense. Call the bluff. PS Puppy bonds may well be likewise.
| 
Do you have questions regarding the health of your greyhound? Do you need tips what you should feed your dog?
