Well done for Grafton. It's hard to comment on the proposed track as few details are published. However, my guess is that 427m was chosen rather than 450m as the latter would have had a bend start. A plan would have been helpful. That aside, my view is that the current Grafton was always a better/fairer trip than its neighbours at Lismore/Casino - one of which is superfluous to the state's needs, particularly as they are only 30km-odd apart and have serious design problems, to say nothing about floods. Presumably the new Grafton will be even better. Separately, I am struggling to identify the "upgrading" referred to in the release at Wenty and Gosford. Repairs hardly justify that terminology. Money does not always mean quality.
|