home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
Do you have questions about greyhound racing?
Do you need advice on how to train a greyhound?

Queensland greyhound racingpage  << 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >> 

Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

14 May 2009 06:35


 (0)
 (0)


Media Release from Greyhounds Queensland Limited.

DETERMINATION ON FUTURE FOR CAIRNS AND MACKAY GREYHOUND CLUB

TOWNSVILLE CLUB APPROVED OF TUESDAY NIGHT TAB RACING

CAIRNS RACING TO RECEIVE FURTHER CONSIDERATION
____________________________________________________________________________

Yesterday, the Greyhounds Queensland Board met to discuss decisions in relation to the de-registration of two North Queensland Greyhound Racing clubs, Cairns and Mackay, from 1 July 2009 and the allocation of TAB racing for Townsville.

Both Cairns and Mackay clubs had been requested to show cause as to their future operations in April. The clubs responded by the Greyhounds Queenslands deadline of close of business on the 6th May, and the clubs responses and viability were carefully considered.

Chair of Greyhounds Queensland, Ms Kerry Watson stated that the viability of the clubs hasnt just been monitored over the last few weeks. The decision had regard to ongoing operational issues over an extended period, and the unlikelihood of these issues being successfully addressed in the future.

The Board concluded that both clubs are not viable under their current circumstances. Mackay will de-registered from 30th June, 2009. The Board did not accept the case for Cairns to be registered from 1 July 2009 on basis as submitted by the club.

Further consideration is being given to Cairns on the back of TAB racing on Tuesday evenings being approved for the Townsville club on a changed basis, which may alter industry demand in that region.

The Townsville club will assume the Tuesday night meeting from 9 July 2009 subject to the necessary SKY Channel infrastructure being in place.

Ms. Watson said Greyhounds Queensland was acting in the best interests of the industry, which hopes to increase long-term support through club consolidation.

Were committed to enhancing and strengthening greyhound racing and believe that through consolidating clubs, current racing hubs like Bundaberg, Rockhampton and Townsville will maintain a strong future, Ms Watson said.

Only time will tell if industry demand supports continued Greyhound racing in Cairns.




Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 6026
Dogs 28 / Races 32

14 May 2009 07:53


 (0)
 (0)


I would like to know just who voted for this and what member representatives from other clubs were involved. Under GQL constitution, all members class A and B have a right to vote.


Louise Inall
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 876
Dogs 31 / Races 0

14 May 2009 08:49


 (0)
 (0)


i think they are making a serious mistake I can see we will not be racing up here in a few years they way they are going


Peter Capper
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 291
Dogs 5 / Races 2

16 May 2009 02:00


 (0)
 (0)


Seems to be quite a few greyhound folk departing Queensland.


Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 05:49


 (0)
 (0)


I don't like to say "I told you so", but hey "I told you so":

1. The Follow On Lure isn't the golden challis many thought it would be.

2. The Cronulla Park track is in trouble. The $10 million promised by the state government was for the Gold Coast replacement, not a free hand out to the industry as a whole.

3. They have already done all the ground testing previously at Logan, with the idea of putting sporting grounds on that plot of land and it failed to meet specs. Let alone the problems they will encounter putting a dog track with grandstands, kennels and a track on the same piece of land.




Peter Capper
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 291
Dogs 5 / Races 2

16 May 2009 06:07


 (0)
 (0)


Contaminated sites seem to be more trouble than they are worth.I think a much better idea would have been to purchase clean land ,in a location central to licensees. .


Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 06:44


 (0)
 (0)


Too right Peter. The money they spend on massive foundations and venting the underground gases seems wasted and could be better spent purchasing a more satisfactory plot of land. You only have to look at what happened with the Albion Park Grandstand too see we are tempting fate. Why as an industry do we never learn from the mistakes of the recent past?




Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 06:51


 (0)
 (0)


Paul Dicks wrote:

3. They have already done all the ground testing previously at Logan, with the idea of putting sporting grounds on that plot of land and it failed to meet specs.

Who would "they" be?



Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 07:24


 (0)
 (0)


20 years ago "they" (Doesn't matter who "they" are does it? But I imagine it was the council) tested the same area with the idea of putting Hockey Fields on there. But it didn't even pass muster for sporting fields, let alone (like I said before) a dog track with grandstands, kennels and a track on the same piece of land.

You seem to be in "the know" Sue, I'm sure you have all the answers ;-)



Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 07:30


 (0)
 (0)


20 years ago..............that says it all.

You should make an effort to find out the current facts before posting misleading information on a public forum.




Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 07:32


 (0)
 (0)


So it was tested before and was found unsuitable?

What is misleading about what I said then?

They built houses in Ipswich on 100 year old mines only to find they were cracking and falling into huge holes. Why would it be any different in the case of the Cronulla Park waste disposal case?

I ask you these questions because you have all the answers and are the judge and jury on Logan Park Track situation.


Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 6026
Dogs 28 / Races 32

16 May 2009 07:32


 (0)
 (0)


What was the outcome of this plan. Council wanted to put sporting fields there, why did this fall through.
EXTERNAL LINK


Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 07:43


 (0)
 (0)


Thanks Dan.

So there was another unsuccessful attempt only a few years ago. Well blow me down, my comment doesn't look misleading at all. Looks like I have in fact under stated and under estimated the situation, over to you Sue.


Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 07:44


 (0)
 (0)


Paul Dicks wrote:

What is misleading about what I said then?

You ommitted to say that what you were stating happened 20 years ago, a mere 5 years after the tip closed. Very misleading and not at all relevant to the situation 20 years later.

Get the facts before you post.



Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 07:47


 (0)
 (0)


It appears there was another one done 4 years ago madam, best you get your facts straight before making accusations. Awaiting an apology, but not expecting one.


Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 07:51


 (0)
 (0)


I assume that is the plan for the Logan City Rugby Union Club. The only thing that failed with their plan was that the Council took the option away from them and gave it to Greyhounds Queensland.

The Rugby Union Club have stated publicly that they were totally disappointed to lose such a wonderful piece of land. They have been offered an alternative site in the University grounds at Meadowbrook.

No apology for the truth.


Dan Hollywood
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 6026
Dogs 28 / Races 32

16 May 2009 07:53


 (0)
 (0)


Gee, thats strange coming from council. Rugby would generate so much more for their community. I think there may be something else behind it.


Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 08:02


 (0)
 (0)


Initially the club thought we would be going to the fantastic site at Cronulla Park, Underwood."

The Saints were originally flagged to move to Cronulla Park, before a proposal to build a multi-million dollar greyhound racing centre at the site back in November 2007, pushed the Saints proposition off the table.

EXTERNAL LINK


Paul Dicks
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 10281
Dogs 120 / Races 252

16 May 2009 08:08


 (0)
 (0)


Sue you seem to have a vested interest or agenda in this track going ahead. Is there something you might need to declare or admit to, to ensure your comments are completely impartial? Not making accusations or suggesting impropriety, just inquisitive.


Sue Burley
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 5559
Dogs 10310 / Races 14781

16 May 2009 08:27


 (0)
 (0)


VESTED INTEREST - "A special interest in protecting or promoting that which is to one's own personal advantage."

If that's what you are pointing to the answer is no.

My interest is what is best for Queensland greyhound racing. We have been given a 20 hectare parcel of land 20k's from the heart of Brisbane, on the main southern suburbs to Brisbane Road. I believe it will cost around 2 million to cap and fill the land etc which will bring it up to the standard of other land in the area. The reason sports clubs haven't succeeded in the past is because they didn't have the money to prepare the land. Wouldn't you like to buy 20 hectares 20 k's from a capital city for $2 million?

The plan after Albion is sold (and hopefully it will be sooner rather than later) is to extend the complex into a Club style facility with function rooms that will also be rented out and generate income. The food and bar profits will also be poured back into the industry, not the case with Albion. It is also planned to build a line of shops along the front of the complex, these will also be rented out and generate more income to be poured back into the industry. I do believe the complex will also house poker machines as well. When this all comes to fruition Qld will have the highest prizemoney of all the States.

This is the biggest opportunity ever given to Qld greyhound racing and I do not understand why anyone in the industry would not get behind it.



posts 12712page  << 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 >>