home - to The Greyhound-Database
Home  |  Dog-Search  |  Dogs ID  |  Races  |  Race Cards  |  Coursing  |  Tracks  |  Statistic  |  Testmating  |  Kennels  
 
   SHOP
Facebook
Login  |  Private Messages  |  add_race  |  add_coursing  |  add_dog  |  Membership  |  Advertising  | Ask the Vet  | Memorials    Help  print pedigree      
TV  |  Active-Sires  |  Sire-Pages  |  Stud Dogs  |  Which Sire?  |  Classifieds  |  Auctions  |  Videos  |  Adoption  |  Forum  |  About_us  |  Site Usage

Welcome to the Greyhound Knowledge Forum

   

The Greyhound-Data Forum has been created to act as a platform for greyhound enthusiasts to share information on this magnificent animal called a greyhound.

Greyhound-Data reserve the right to remove any post that is off topic, advertisements or opinions they consider to be offensive.

Please read the forum usage manual please note:

If you answer then please try to stay on topic. It's absolutely okay to answer in a broader scope but don't hijack posts by switching to something off topic.

In case you see an insulting post: DO NOT REPLY TO IT!
Use the report button to inform the moderators so that we can delete it.

Read more...

All TopicsFor SaleGD-WebsiteBreedingHealthRacingCoursingRetirementBettingTalkLogin to post
If you need help or advice about a dog you are retiring then this is the place for you.

A big fat lie!


Jamie Quinlivian
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 8727
Dogs 10 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 05:22


 (5)
 (0)


OK, here we go.
I want to register my retired greyhounds with the local council.
The way I read the domestic animals act 1994, a dog that is registered with GRV, can be registered with council for a reduced fee. As for racing or breeding dogs, they do not need council registration at all.
So after 2 weeks of trying to get an answer, today I finally got one.
It seems that a dog that has been retired through GAP, gets the reduced fee. But a dog that I have bred, reared, raced and retired to the couch, does not get the reduced fee. Its about $130 difference.

I argued until I was blue in the face that because my dogs are still on my fasttrack account, they still come under GRV, even though they are no longer racing or breeding.
But apparently, according to GRV, a retired dog is no longer on their system!!!
Which means - if GRV welfare or integrity or stewards come on to my property and ask me the whereabouts of a retired dog, I can tell them to go away because they have no jurisdiction over that dog anymore.
It also means I can go hunting with my retired dog. It also means I can breed my dog with a Bull Mastiff bitch and sell super hunting dogs. It also means I can euthanize as many race dogs as I want, all I have to do is retire them. So if the dog fails GAP, I can take it home, retire it as a pet, then euthanize it. No questions asked because the dog is no longer under GRV control.

The thing with GAP is also disappointing to learn. Because we try to do our best to rehome our dogs, but soon people will learn that a privately rehomed dog will cost $200 to register, whereas a GAP dog is $70.

I'm a bit stunned.




Ashleigh Kay
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 15
Dogs 0 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 07:18


 (1)
 (0)


I'm gobsmacked that anywhere would charge $200 to register a dog. That is sooo expensive.


Hayden Gilders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 993
Dogs 29 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 07:33


 (2)
 (0)


i put a dog thru gap a few years ago purely for the purpose of the green collar. my intent was to send the dog to perth for my daughter. the dog was at gap only for a week 2 days after i got her back i received a visit from council and a bill for registration of the dog. i have suspicions that there was comunication between gap and the council re the change in classification of the dog. i have little faith in the system the dog was flown to perth within the week


Michael Barry
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 7402
Dogs 26 / Races 9

15 Mar 2019 07:53


 (3)
 (0)


Jamie Quinlivian wrote:

OK, here we go.
I want to register my retired greyhounds with the local council.
The way I read the domestic animals act 1994, a dog that is registered with GRV, can be registered with council for a reduced fee. As for racing or breeding dogs, they do not need council registration at all.
So after 2 weeks of trying to get an answer, today I finally got one.
It seems that a dog that has been retired through GAP, gets the reduced fee. But a dog that I have bred, reared, raced and retired to the couch, does not get the reduced fee. Its about $130 difference.

I argued until I was blue in the face that because my dogs are still on my fasttrack account, they still come under GRV, even though they are no longer racing or breeding.
But apparently, according to GRV, a retired dog is no longer on their system!!!
Which means - if GRV welfare or integrity or stewards come on to my property and ask me the whereabouts of a retired dog, I can tell them to go away because they have no jurisdiction over that dog anymore.
It also means I can go hunting with my retired dog. It also means I can breed my dog with a Bull Mastiff bitch and sell super hunting dogs. It also means I can euthanize as many race dogs as I want, all I have to do is retire them. So if the dog fails GAP, I can take it home, retire it as a pet, then euthanize it. No questions asked because the dog is no longer under GRV control.

The thing with GAP is also disappointing to learn. Because we try to do our best to rehome our dogs, but soon people will learn that a privately rehomed dog will cost $200 to register, whereas a GAP dog is $70.

I'm a bit stunned.


why would you bother registering your dog with the local council ?


Ian Bradshaw
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 251
Dogs 6 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 08:49


 (0)
 (0)


Michael Barry wrote:

Jamie Quinlivian wrote:

OK, here we go.
I want to register my retired greyhounds with the local council.
The way I read the domestic animals act 1994, a dog that is registered with GRV, can be registered with council for a reduced fee. As for racing or breeding dogs, they do not need council registration at all.
So after 2 weeks of trying to get an answer, today I finally got one.
It seems that a dog that has been retired through GAP, gets the reduced fee. But a dog that I have bred, reared, raced and retired to the couch, does not get the reduced fee. Its about $130 difference.

I argued until I was blue in the face that because my dogs are still on my fasttrack account, they still come under GRV, even though they are no longer racing or breeding.
But apparently, according to GRV, a retired dog is no longer on their system!!!
Which means - if GRV welfare or integrity or stewards come on to my property and ask me the whereabouts of a retired dog, I can tell them to go away because they have no jurisdiction over that dog anymore.
It also means I can go hunting with my retired dog. It also means I can breed my dog with a Bull Mastiff bitch and sell super hunting dogs. It also means I can euthanize as many race dogs as I want, all I have to do is retire them. So if the dog fails GAP, I can take it home, retire it as a pet, then euthanize it. No questions asked because the dog is no longer under GRV control.

The thing with GAP is also disappointing to learn. Because we try to do our best to rehome our dogs, but soon people will learn that a privately rehomed dog will cost $200 to register, whereas a GAP dog is $70.

I'm a bit stunned.


why would you bother registering your dog with the local council ?

City of Bendigo

If your dog or cat is found straying, unregistered, out of control or being a nuisance in public, you may be issued with a fine. You have 28 days to pay that infringement notice or to take other action.

Offences and associated fines
Dog wandering or not securely confined to owner's premises during day $238
Dog wandering or not securely confined to owner's premises at night $317
Dog rushing or chasing a person $159
Non Serious injury caused by dog attack $396
Cat not confined to owner's premises from sunset to sunrise $159

Failure to apply to register a dog or cat $317

Registered dog or cat not wearing its Council ID marker outside owners premises $79
Dog or cat creating a nuisance $79
Dog not under effective control $159
Failure by a person in control of a dog, to carry a bag or means to pick up excrement deposited by their dog in a public place $100
Failure to pick up and properly dispose of your animals excrement in a public place $100



Martyn Empson
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 149
Dogs 0 / Races 3

15 Mar 2019 09:14


 (1)
 (1)


why dont you desex them fist
only $45 or ($22.50 concession) for rego then

EXTERNAL LINK

Desexed: $45 ($22.50 concession)
10+ years old: $45 ($22.50 concession)
Dogs kept for breeding by the proprieter of a domestic animal business conducted on registered premises: $45 ($22.50 concession)
Dogs registered with an applicable organisation, if their owners are members of the applicable organisation with which the dogs are registered: $45 ($22.50 concession)
Dogs that have completed obedience training which complies with regulations: $45 ($22.50 concession)
Dogs kept by a primary producer on a rural property for working stock: $45 ($22.50 concession)
Declared dangerous, Restricted Breed or Menacing Dog $135
All other dogs: $135 ($67.50 concession)




Jamie Quinlivian
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 8727
Dogs 10 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 10:13


 (2)
 (0)


Mick, because I'm the only idiot in my street who likes to be up front and above board.
Martin, $72 in Wbool and I don't have any concessions. And her first litter are going very well so we might give her a 4th litter. And because she's had 3, GRV have declared her an inactive brood.

But what shocked me most is that even though these dogs are still in my name on fasttrack, according to GRV they are off the system.
And that a dog put through GAP is rated differently than one you have loved for it's whole life and given it a forever home.
No incentive at all.
All the new euthanasia rules are totally irrelevant once the dog is retired.



Hayden Gilders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 993
Dogs 29 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 10:59


 (0)
 (0)


no jamie thats not quite true. paraphrased the rules say that the the last registered (grv) owner is responsible for the dog and in this case despite your good intentions that is you



Jamie Quinlivian
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 8727
Dogs 10 / Races 0

15 Mar 2019 19:43


 (3)
 (0)


Yes I get that mate but according to the conversation between council and GRV, there is no difference between my retired greys and the mongrel down the road.
So whatever I choose to do with my retired greys, GRV have absolutely no say in it.



Jeanette Spruyt
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 246
Dogs 2 / Races 0

16 Mar 2019 05:16


 (0)
 (1)


what I have in my head:
dogs that go through GAP have a classification in regards to their suitability out in the public(opposed to ones that have not gone through the system e.g. ok with cats, ok around kids, ok around little dogs and so on................some have only one label,some have more than one.
So the dog that is retired through a GRV member, either kept by a member or passed on to another party - this information is recorded, so the dog is tracked and it's whereabouts known opposed to the dog just disappearing.
How it works with the council, well I have always known that if my dog did exit the GRV system from a participant point of view - whether it be breeding or racing, then it would just become a normal dog from a council point of view.
With the GAP, I don't know how their registrations are done, I think it was said here that they get a reduction - if that is the case then it must be so the people that take the dogs on are given a better deal because their taking on GAP dogs, that would make sense.
It is like your dog is like a wild dog opposed to a GAP dog that has gone through a process.
Without staying on this computer too long and missing out on the weather outside and trying to put in a nutshell - greyhounds are tracked one way or the other, good luck to the GAP owners and their reduction that they have, those dogs can always be sent back to GAP and re homed if need be. Any dogs still in the circle of GRV e.g. racers, breeding, stud will have to be muzzled outside of the premises. If you choose to keep any greyhounds that are not active anymore, then of course I would say that you would have to register them with the council, all dogs are tracked one way or another.
I suppose as someone else pointed out it is an incentive for the dog to be desexed to get a reduction, which is not a bad incentive.
Females would cost more than males to desex, so maybe it would be great if a reduction could be offered for that.
Otherwise we would have to put our dog through GAP in order for that to happen, and I suppose by that happening the dog gets a classification with their behaviour. If the dog can't pass GAP, then it stands to reason that it should be registered with the council if your going to keep the ex greyhound - because it is left up to you to know what it can or can't do, you the experienced handler of the greyhound.
I have a dog here that I don't think will ever pass GAP, he is already desexed because of his balls being in his groin. I have already come to terms with the fact that I would never try and give him to anyone as he would be a risk in the normal domain.
Would it be my choice to take him to a vet and have him put down because of his wilder risk, well of course I would have to say to the vet that I believe that he is a risk or if it came to be that I wasn't capable of looking after him anymore.
He will stay with me until his old age and I will only take him to a vet to be put down if his health was at risk.
So in saying that, I view all my greyhounds under the rules in regards to welfare. I obviously don't have to worry about the rego. cost because he's de sexed. So I am happy to pay to keep him around.
I will always manage this dog as if he is a greyhound in the sense of kennelling. I have experienced this dog inside already - when he first come home from his castration - let him sleep in my room for two nights, to ensure that his stitches were safe from him and the safeguard that i had in place was right. So in time and his retirement he will have his concessions in life, I can see that.
Sorry there is no nutshell above but the answer is clear.
Get dogs fixed up then rego. isn't an issue.
Maybe GRV should look at having/supporting reduced Vet fees somehow for ex greyhounds that do get fixed up.

I don't understand Hayden's situation, if the dog went through GAP then that does not seem fair at all, that the council would jump on him.

At the end of the day, most people believe that dogs, cats or whatever should be desexed(If their not breeding stock), the females won't have seasons anymore which in itself takes away many issues/headaches. The males may settle a bit more which also takes away headaches.

I can understand Jamie how you are upset, you have always come across how important the dog is to you. And your care is no less than the GAP owner. But in a way you don't have a certificate if you like for the retired dogs capabilities, and we are fortunate that the council will offer the GAP takers of dogs an incentive.
Obviously your heart is in the right place too.

I never registered my old blue girl at the council because she was going to be a brood bitch but time got the better of us.
I remember getting her checked out at Sandown to see if she was ok for it because of her age, got the all clear.
Time went on from there and more time again. I decided to get her put to sleep at 14 years of age.
I hope some of the above makes sense, all I know is that times have changed, and the greyhound is more important than ever.

p.s. are you going to apply for a 4th litter? best wishes.
Get that one happening first I would say!

p.s. if you ever want a challenge, you can train my boy without his nuts, he's a mad railer, would like someone else to give him a great chance.




Jeanette Spruyt
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 246
Dogs 2 / Races 0

16 Mar 2019 06:48


 (0)
 (0)


Rule changes with broodies, obviously has made a surprise or realise! situation (really not something that I have had to think about).

Just a general question: If, for example, you sent your bitch to GAP - is it so that you can ask for that greyhound to be re homed to you?



Jeanette Spruyt
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 246
Dogs 2 / Races 0

16 Mar 2019 07:48


 (0)
 (0)


Jeanette Spruyt wrote:

How it works with the council, well I have always known that if my dog did exit the GRV system from a participant point of view - whether it be breeding or racing, then it would just become a normal dog from a council point of view.

I suppose I should specify when you - retire as a pet opposed to breeding or racing, as above.
Once you retire as a pet, with no more intention for that greyhound to be involved any more in anyway.
Just a real pet.





Jamie Quinlivian
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 8727
Dogs 10 / Races 0

16 Mar 2019 17:32


 (0)
 (0)


Hi Jeanette.
Yes I probably will book her into GAP then adopt her back which means no more litters for her. I looked at getting her exemption for the fourth litter but that only lasts for 120 days.
What I don't understand is that the retired dogs stay on my fasttrack account. And I believe the integrity folks can come on to my property asking the whereabout of any dog listed under my name. In which case, they are still registered with GRV? Looks simple enough but here we have GRV telling council that the dogs are off the system as soon as they are retired.
So either the guy at GRV has no idea what he's talking about, or council are just too arrogant to admit that are wrong.
I'm thinking it's all the above.

And no I'm not training anymore but thanks for the offer.



Carly Absalom
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 215
Dogs 0 / Races 0

17 Mar 2019 01:26


 (1)
 (0)


Jamie,

I have spent a few months getting my head around all of it to after moving to Victoria. In NSW we have a local rule that means if the greyhound is staying with the owner or trainer when they retire they dont have to be registered with the council. Great initiative that makes it much easier for participants to keep dogs in retirement even if they wont be used for breeding. I am going to write to GRV suggesting they adopt this rule. I have always kept all my dogs as pets after racing in NSW but given the expense of registering here as well as needing the excess dog permits, I am not sure that that will be feasible in Victoria.

In moving to Victoria, I brought with me 2 retired greyhounds and 2 active greyhounds. After reading through a heap of information it was clear retired dogs are meant to be registered with the Council, any active dogs dont. We had to put in for an excess dog permit and the two active dogs were just listed by the Council as GRV registered. I got the shock of my life when I saw how much it was to register a non-desexed dog. Booked my boy in to be desexed the next day. For my racing bitch I am thinking about whether it will be more feasible to register her as a broodbitch when she retires, even though I have no intention of breeding with her, so she will still be active with GRV.

GRV has a microchip register for retired greyhounds. My two retired ones are on this, however, they still need to be registered with the council. I dont know what that means in terms of what control each group has over them.

The issue you mentioned about the broodbitch becoming inactive at 8 or after certain number of litters is a big issue. As an active broodbitch you pay no registration fees to the Council. Once a dog is 10 years of age you get the reduced fee. However, there is at least a 2 year period where you would be expected to pay the full fee. It seems to be an anomaly that came about because they decided at 8 years of age broodbitches were inactive but they didnt think through all the consequences of that.

I was going to write to my local member about this issue. It really should be very easy and cheap for participants to keep their dogs in retirement. Isnt that what they want us to do? Ill let you know if I hear anything back.



Hayden Gilders
Australia
(Verified User)
Posts 993
Dogs 29 / Races 0

17 Mar 2019 07:14


 (0)
 (0)


on the general topic of gapi have a. issue in that i had one assessed just last week he lunged at the little white dog and has been banned from reassesment for 6 months. had he not lunged at the dog and instead lunged at a cat during the more intensive assessment he would have been labelled "not cat friendly"and been permitted to continue the process. its a bit funny as they are both small animals. maybe a plebacite is whats needed. dogs or cats or dogs and cats

posts 15