Firstly I'd like those involved to get the Stewards out of bed on a Sunday the protests would want to be good as you've heard of the term "The Hanging Judge" well that's how stewards feel when called in on Sundays having their weekend ruined so best of luck to Hummie and NTPAW.

Hummie quote from previous page post:

"Protest I meant to take Viridian as I was reading from the top down hence thinking it was number 1 Ian honest mistake."

Chairman of Stewards: "Fark me dead Convener who's representing this bloke fair dinkum".
Convener: Himself chief
Hummie: "The error it's cost me outright first place this week."
Chairman: "Hummie do you think we can read minds?"
Hummie: "Yes a good steward should, it was farking plainly obvious Jungle Edge was out as the track was rated a soft 6 and it had to lump 62kgs so why would I pick it".
Chairman: "Your quite right so you can have Viridian as claimed above"
Convener: "Objection Chairmain but there was no Varidian in the race"
Chairman: "I know Convener why do you reckon I let him farking have it"
Hummie: "Chairman I ment to type Viridine"
Chairman: "Like you ment to type the No. 2 and not No. 1. Protest DISMISSED, now fark off and count your money you cleaned up on at Goulburn Friday $1,890 and some more"

SECOND Hearing:

This came via the Private Messages section in G-Data on forwarded by contestant Mockers Macwollie.

Not The PAW has aked why he got 4 points and shouldn't it have been only 3.

Chairman: "Welcome NTPAW as this is not a hangable offence to question the accuracy of the scoring system as unlike the previous bastid above you were intitled to the extra point as I'll have the Convener explain".

The Convener: "NTPAW as your sort of new to the game and did not want to embarass your self with an open (but asked in-camera) objection ( a protest as we call them in Aust. ) on here I'm sorry to out you but the scoring is correct you got the sub in the last leg for WILMOT PASS who was scratched. The sub was the subsequent winner SHOWMANSHIP who I note you already had so you got that horse twice and 2 points noted as in XWWWS on your score card. I've noted most times when you have noticed a scratching you change for a new selection which is OK but if you hadn't changed your leg 2 scratching yesterday you would of got Hummies lost Viridine and ended up with 5 points for the day. BTW you can't give the point you don't want to that farking Hummie as points are non-transferable."
Chairman: "Well that seems pretty straight forward NTPAW you are on 11 points and when you get a sub you only get your money back ie: for the win and not the subs win dividend."

Convener: "That raps up Sunday's hearings and the lesson learnt today is what you type is what you get when submitting selections so take care."

thank you sir for the explanation.

I simply did not want a point I did not earn.

also Mr Convenor I think in these covid times that anything is transferrable especially so in Victoria, besides it was quite obvious that Shaggy did intend to pick the 2 as the mudlark was a scr the day before.......even when I first saw it, I must admit I thought what a dumb@rse! Not even he cld be that silly!lol.

I tried Graham.

2-12-13

6-11

4- 14

Good luck all pack the willy warmer gaz

6
2,7,12
4,8,11
4,11,14
Thanks.

Gee the Convener's given us a tough one today at Randwick.

R6- 6
R7- 2, 5 & 7
R8- 9 & 16
R9- 5, 9, 12 & 15