Race statistic of Pams Vienna
Pams Vienna has won the following races: (2.0 PTS)
Number of races run per year
Year | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | Total |
---|
Races | 8 | 5 | 3 | 16 |
---|
How was the dog placed on the different distances?
Summary of year 1999 |
---|
| Places | Times | |
---|
Dist m/y | # runs | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | avg | fastest | fastest race | Form |
480 / 525 | 8 | 4 | 2 | | 2 | | | 29.50 | 29.20 | 10 SEP 1999 | 0 |
Total | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
Summary of year 2000 |
---|
| Places | Times | |
---|
Dist m/y | # runs | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | avg | fastest | fastest race | Form |
480 / 525 | 5 | 2 | | | | 2 | 1 | 29.20 | 29.11 | 13 MAY 2000 | 0 |
Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
Summary of year 2001 |
---|
| Places | Times | |
---|
Dist m/y | # runs | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | avg | fastest | fastest race | Form |
400 / 437 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 24.58 | 24.58 | 5 JAN 2001 | 0 |
475 / 519 | 1 | | | | | 1 | | 29.27 | 29.27 | 11 JAN 2001 | 0 |
485 / 530 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | 29.06 | 29.06 | 21 JAN 2001 | 0 |
Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
Summary of all years |
---|
| Places | Times | |
---|
Dist m/y | # runs | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | avg | fastest | fastest race | Form |
400 / 437 | 1 | | | | 1 | | | 24.58 | 24.58 | 5 JAN 2001 | 0 |
475 / 519 | 1 | | | | | 1 | | 29.27 | 29.27 | 11 JAN 2001 | 0 |
480 / 525 | 13 | 6 | 2 | | 2 | 2 | 1 | 29.38 | 29.11 | 13 MAY 2000 | 0 |
485 / 530 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | 29.06 | 29.06 | 21 JAN 2001 | 0 |
Total | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
Comparison of the dogs times to the times of the winners and other runners per track
Last 8 races of the dog are taken into account.
dwt= Difference in seconds between the dog's time and the average winning time on this track on that quarter of the year dt= Difference in seconds between the dog's time and the average runner time on this track on that quarter of the year
A negative number means the dog was faster that the average winning/runner time. A positive number means the dog was slower than the average winning/runner time.
|